a party was either a concourse of knights in shining armor, or it was a part of the hosts of Satan. All was black or white; there were no shades — of gray. Actually, by far the greater part of the denunciatory material came from the Tories; the Liberals were too busy pointing with pride to their achievements to indulge in any extensive name-calling. | By the time the 1911 election campaign began, I had reached an age when I had an enthusiastic interest, in everything that concerned tho political world. Whether I had anything resembling an intelligent rr: of the issues or the philosophies of either party, is a matter of extreme doubt. Looking back, I can see that I accepted as gospel every statement of the party sachems who, night after night, sat around our kitchen table, planning strategy, revising polling lists, and roundly denouncing everything Liberal. They always expressed boundless confidence, but 3 omehow I sensed that it was mostly whistling in the dark. The victory that would be won at the polls was , I am sure, as great a surprise to the triumphant Tories as it was to the defeated Grits. of major interest to Islanders in this campaign was the Conservative pledge to provide daily all-year contact with the mainland. At the start, there seems to have been very little discussion of the main issue -- whether or to enter into a lieciprocity Treaty with the United States. Since the Grits were sponsoring the proposal, the Tories naturally opposed it, but the subject drew little real fire until Champ Clark, a former Speaker of the American House of Representatives made a speech in which he referred to Canada becoming an "annex to the United States." The Tories leaped upon this remark, and turned it into the major issue of the campaign. Dismal stories were told, and weird pictures painted, of the sorry plight of farmers in many parts of the States. Canadians were solemly warned that they could expect even more distressing conditions in Canada, if the country should fall under Uncle Sam's control. The call for