formed in Hopedale in 1878“; it is not known if this was connected directly with the club, but is is probable that many club members were connected with it. Whether or not members sincerely supported the movement was irrelevant; they were part of a society still ruled by the province’s elite and these men, at least in public, respected club policy and the prohibition crusade. The fever to quench the liquor craze, to ban the bottle, was widespread on the Island but never unanimously supported by Islanders. There were, throughout the temperance era, always some who rejected the cause and continued to drink, in secrecy and in public. There might not have been evidence of indecorous behavior at the 1876 games, but the praise that had been lavished on the guests that year was not offered the year after. A number of people in attendance at the 1877 games were seen in varying states of inebriation. The newspapers and public brought their wrath down upon not only the offenders but the Caledonian Club as well. The previous year’s organ of praise, the Patriot, became this year’s hand of judgment. It accused the club of permitting liquor at the event (a refutable point) and expressed its disapproval of such lack of proper controls. But this paper was an affirmed advocate of prohibition, in its words, “A Semi-Weekly Journal Devoted to Local Interests, Temperance, Agriculture, and News.” Another leading newspaper, the Daily Examiner, may have been less zealously supportive of the anti-liquor league; it may not have wished to castigate openly the club to which it normally gave favourable publicity. A letter to the newspaper’s editor was, however, probably more injurious to the club’s respectability than the remarks by the Patriot. The letter asked for clarification of the situation: To the Editor of the Daily Examiner SIR — Will you kindly inform me whether, at the Caledonia Gathering, intoxicating drinks were sold on or near the grounds; if so, whether the persons selling had a licence to sell there, and by whom such licences were issued? ENQUIRER The editor’s response was as vaguely suggestive of the club’s guilt as the letter itself: Refreshments were, we are informed, sold on the grounds by the proprietor of the “North Star” Drinking Saloon. A good many persons were drunk; but we are unable to inform our 53