intended for sale in the British ship market.675 Finally, there are comments on the impending decline of the industry, as wooden ships were being replaced by iron and steam vessels, and the ship-building materials on the island were perceived by some to be running out.676 Places receiving mention in the extracts as centres of 677. 678. shipbuilding are Bedeque Bay , Richmond Bay , 'Grand Rustico Harbor’679; St. Peters Bays”; Murray Harbours“; Three Rivers / Georgetownm; 675 Anon. (1818): “More than forty sail of ships are employed in the timber trade to Europe; some of them six hundred tons burthen, and all built upon the island"; MacGregor (1828) noted that the island had derived “considerable benefit“ by building vessels for the seal and cod fisheries of Newfoundland, but he went on to say: “The “building of vessels for the British Market" is “the branch of trade in which the largest capital has been invested, and that which has given employment to the greatest number of men, while it has at the same time been also of considerable benefit to the colony, until the late depression in the value of shipping Upwards of a hundred brigs and ships registering from 140 to 550 tons each, have been built in different parts of the island within the last few years". However, four years later, during one of the downswings, he wrote (MacGregor 1832): "ship- building, unless it be the building of vessels for the carrying of trade of the colony, and a few schooners for the Newfoundland fisheries is at an end"; Bouchette (1832): “Ship-building is still a branch of trade of some moment; numbers of vessels, from 150 to 600 tons, are readily disposed of in the British market; and to this may be added a large number constantly constructed for the Newfoundland fisheries"; Lewellin (1832): “The colony produces timber for vessel building; here are an abundance of shipwrights."; Hill (1839): “ship building has proved a profitable source of production, and furnished a valuable export to Great Britain. The exports to Newfoundland, have chiefly consisted of many vessels for the grand fisheries of that island"; Murray (1839): “The building of ships is also a considerable branch [of trade], and their vessels, though some have been carelessly constructed, bear on the whole a good reputation." 676 Land Commission (1860): evidence of Edward Thornton, M:P.P.: “shipbuilding has gone down and land [at Murray Harbour] has depreciated in value"; William McGowan (a delegate from Lots 44 and 45), refers in the past tense to the years "when shipbuilding was carried on somewhat extensively"; Orlebar (1862): “the wood for ship building is fast disappearing, and of late years the number of ships built has greatly diminished"; Ward (1887): “ship-building [at Summerside] is largely an industry of the past". However, the mini-boom in the 1870s is reflected in the comments of two visiting writers: Rowan (1876): “ships in different stages of progress may be seen in winter apparently in the fields or the middle of villages"; Anon. (1877): “ship-building is in a very thriving condition". 6" MacGregor 1828; Gesner 1846 (“at the shore near St. Eleanors”, i.e. at what is now Summerside); Anon. 1877 (at Summerside). Also, both Mann (1840) and Seymour (1840) noted in their journals (not extracted) the ship Dahlia being built in the Pope shipyard at Bedeque. 67" MacGregor 1828; Gesner (1846): at Port Hill he observed “nine ships upon the stocks". 679 Bagster 1861 (p. 63, not extracted). “0 Seymour 1840: "seven vessels building in the woods"; Gesner 1846 (at the mouth of the Morell River). 102 Mount Stewart, Souris and Fortunes“. This is not a complete list, as is evident from the comprehensive regional breakdown of the industry in Part Two of De Jong and Moore (1994).684 The trees used in shipbuilding — The trees that are mentioned in the island records extracted in this report as either being available for, or used in ship- building are: pine for masts (mostly in eighteenth century records)685; black spruce for masts and sparssas, and for the ’topsides and decks’w; yellow birch for the parts of the ship below the water-linem; and tamarack for the knees689, as 681 MacGregor 1828; Hill 1839; Land Commission 1860 (evidence of Hon. Edward Thornton, M.P.P.). The first and last mention the Cambridge shipyard, the latter retrospectively. “2 MacGregor1828; Bouchette 1832; Hill 1839; Gesner 1846, 683 The latter three are mentioned by Anon. (1877), 68‘ As De Jong & Moore (1994) (p. 13) point out, very little documentation on community-based activities and shipyard operations appears to survive. However, Greenhill 8. Giffard‘s (1967) Westcountrymen in Prince Edward‘s Isle utilizes many types of sources to give a highly interesting picture of the ship- building enterprise initiated by Devon entrepreneurs in Lots 13 and 14 in 1818 and continued by their successors on the island into the 1870s See also Chapter 4 of Morrison's (1983) Along the North Share for a useful re-construction of ship-building in another western township, Lot 11. 685 The pines of the island as a potential source of masts are referred to by Holland (1765) (March), Anon. (1768), [Clark] (1779) and Stewart (1806). It also appears that the mention of ‘ship timber' at Three Rivers and Cape Bear by Anon. (1762) is a reference to pine suitable for masts. “6 Stewart 1806; Hill 1839; Bain 1890. Chappell (1775-1818) used the “best black spruce" for the gaffs, boom and the fourteen foot long mast of “the great barge" that he built in Charlottetown in 1779. I also note that the Surveyor General of Nova Scotia Charles Morris in 1773-74 in connection with a report on the forests of Cape Breton Island noted that “Black Spruce affords excellent masts for vessels about one hundred tons and under; it seldom grows above two feet in diameter clear of sap[wood] but would serve for top masts for capital ships and smaller yards; it is esteemed much stronger than pine, and very little heavier" (cited by Johnson (1986), (pp. 41 ~42). “7 Hill (1839) — by ‘topsides', I presume that he means the exterior planking above the water line. 6“ Stewart 1806; Anon. 1808; Hill 1839; Bain 1890. None of these recorders specify the particular parts of ships for which yellow birch was used. However, Perley (1847) in his paper on the trees of New Brunswick noted that black and yellow birch (he differentiated them as separate species) were used for “that part of the frame of vessels that always remains under water", i.e. the ”keel and lower timbers of vessels", adding that black birch was "almost imperishable under water”. A similar comment on its use was made by the Surveyor General of Nova Scotia Charles Morris in 1773-74 in connection with a report on the forests of Cape Breton Island: ”Black birch is used here in ship-building and has been found to be more durable than Oak, especially for such parts of vessels as lie under water and for plank" (cited by Johnson 1986, p. 41).