have an experience or to gather information that might be used as a subject for literary creation and expression. However, what is important is that, whatever their initial motive, for each of them, their trips into the woods resulted in a literary creation of some sort or other, and these creations were the first expression of a post-pioneer appreciation of the forest that stood apart from the antagonistic attitude that predominated among the mass of the population. The forest as a place of novelty and adventure — In the island literature there survive two accounts of excursions into the forest that contain a strong element of a search for novelty and adventure, though the write—ups that resulted have more the feeling of ’pseudo-adventures' than real excursions, with the accounts, and the forest they describe, having a strong input from the imagination and creativity of the two authors. The two could not be more different in background: the earlier was Robert Gray, a 46 year old Scottish-born Loyalist and government office-holder, who in August 1793 led a small gr0up of men through the forests of Lot 13 from Malpeque Bay (near present-day Tyne Valley) to the Egmont Bay shore; the other was a young Englishwoman, Isabella Bird, at 23 half Gray’s age, who, when on a North American tour in the summer of 1854, made an ’expedition’ into some woods near St. Eleanors. For both authors the two journeys were to assume a greater importance on account of the literary effort that each of them put into the 'writing up’ of their visits as adventurous stories for others to read: Gray included his embellished account in what, incongruously, would otherwise have been a straightforward business letter that he sent to the landlord of Lot 13 back in England for whom he was acting as agent (in fact its only reader until its recent publication in The Island Magazine was the landlord's agent in England 86°); Isabella Bird’s account reached a much wider contemporary audience: she included it in the chapter on Prince Edward Island in her travel book An Eng/ishwoman in America. Despite the differences in the backgrounds of the two writers and in the nature of their ’expeditions’, there are some interesting similarities in the contents of their stories. Firstly, both present their excursions into the forest as a journey in search of a specific objective, which “6° Sobey 1997. 129 even before entering the woods they clothe with an element of mystery. Here is Robert Gray describing the start of his journey: It was with great mortification to me on inquiry to find that no person in that country had ever been through Township 13 to Egmont Bay. This though discouraging did not deter me from attempting to execute what I had planned, to penetrate through the Lot to Egmont Bay and view as much of it as my time would possibly permit. Much dissuasion by the Tenants against the attempt on the grounds of its impracticability, from imperfect and uncertain accounts received from Indians did not shake me. And | persisted in saying that I would proceed alone if none would accompany me. A rather prosaic objective — simply to cross the island to its southern side (an eight and a half mile journey at that particular spot), and to note the forests and land along the way — has been invested with an element of the mysterious. His insertion of ’Indians' into his story — as Isabella Bird also does in hers — though neither writer came across any ’lndians’ in the woods — was an easy way for both to give their stories an exotic North American colouring for their English readership. Likewise, Miss Bird at the beginning of her story invests her ’exploring expedition’ with ’mystery’ (she actually uses the word), by making it a journey in search of a spring long 'lost’ in the woods: We set out on an exploring expedition in search of a spring which Mr. K. remembered in his childish days. We went down to a lonely cabin to make inquiries, and were told that ”none but the old people knew of it — it was far away in the woods.” Here was mystery; so, leaving the waggon, into the woods we went to seek for it. Another similarity is that in the search for these different objectives, both authors stress — and, I think, also exaggerate — the great personal difficulties they experienced on their journeys. Robert Gray: l was not to be baffled by this obstacle [Le a ”spruce fir swamp”] nor by the remonstrances of my companions who wished to return, added to the extreme heat of the weather, much greater than in England, and the incessant attacks of moschettoes and other troublesome flies, which was such that we could hardly venture to stop to take a drink of water — the least relaxation of our hands and handkerchiefs in brushing them away producing Swarms like the swarms of Bees just broke loose from the hive and ready to devour us. Continuing our journey we were often obliged to lift ourselves up by the help of the boughs and step from the top of one