99L 
     
    
   
   
    
       
     
    
   
   
    
       
     
    
   
   
    
     TABLE 1-2. The occurrence of names referring to pine species in lists made by all those recorders who aimed to provide a list (even if incomplete) of the trees occurring 
     
     on Prince Edward Island (see the footnote for the names of the recorders). Most of the lists were intended to apply to the whole island (though most recorders would 
     
     have known only a part of the island). 
     
    
   
   
    
       
     
    
   
   
    
     nan 
     
     _IIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 
     
    
   
   
    
     'Pine of various kinds' IIIIIIIDIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 
     
     Isome pines’ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 
     
    
   
   
    
     ’Other species of the pine 
     
     tribe’ 
     
    
   
   
    
     IIIIIDIIIDIIIUDIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGUIU 
     
    
   
   
    
     Ii 
     
     III 
     
     'White, Weymouth or 
     
     IIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 
     
     ‘American or 
     
     IIIIIIIIIIHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 
     
     II 
     
     II 
     
     II 
     
     III 
     
     I 
     
    
   
   
    
     IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIII 
     
     IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIIIIIII 
     
     IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 
     
     IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIDIIIUIIII 
     
     IIIIIIIIIIUIIIDIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 
     
     IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 
     
     IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 
     
    
   
   
    
     Key to recorders: 1 - Holland (1764); 2 - Holland (1765: March); 3 - Holland (1765: October); 4 - Morris (1769); 5 - Patterson (1770); 6 - Patterson (1774); 7 - Curtis (1775); 8 - 
     
     [Clark] (1779); 9 - lnglis (1789); 10 — [Cambridge ](1796?); 11 — Walsh (1803); 12 — Selkirk (1803); 13 - [MacDonald] (1804); 14 - Selkirk (1805); 15 - Stewart (1806); 16 - Anon. 
     
     (1808); 17 - [Hill] (1819); 18 - Johnstone (1822); 19 — MacGregor (1828); 20 — Bouchette (1832); 21 - Martin (1837); 22 — Murray (1839); 23 — Hill (1839); 24 - Gesner (1846); 25 - 
     
     Monro (1855); 26 - Sutherland (1861); 27 - Bagster (1861); 28 - Anon. (1877); 29 - [Bain] (1882); 30 - Bain (1890); 31 - McSwain & Bain (1891); 32 Macoun (1894); 33 - Pollard 
     
     (1898); 34 - Johnston (1895); 35 - Burke (1902); 36 - Crosskill (1904); 37 - [Watson?] (post 1904). 
     
    
   
   
    
       
     
    
   
   
    
     Curtis (1775) uses the phrase “pine of different quality" — since he omits the other conifers it may be that this phrase is meant to refer to the conifers in general. 
     
    

    
     ii The name “white pine" is also used in a non-list context by Smethurst (1774). 
     
     Since Bagster's (1861) list already contains white pine (as "Pinus strobus, Fragrant pine"), his "Pinus A/ba, white pine”, may instead be white spruce, Pinus a/ba being an obsolete 
     
     name for white spruce (Elwes & Henry 1910, Vol. Vl, p. 1380). 
     
    

    
     i Since Pinus canadens/s is an obsolete botanical name for hemlock, it is likely that Bagster’s (1861) "Pinus Canadensis, Canada pine” is that species. 
     
    

    
     * McSwain 84 Bain (1891) give Latin names only: Pinus res/nose and P. strobus. These have been placed in the rows for the standard common names. 
     
    
   
   
    
     t [Bain’s] (1882) list contains only the broad—leaved trees.