L

£8

'Miminegash region'. ’cedar grew ’Cedar - in isolated patches near Tignish’.

[Lawson] 1877-1878: I, ; Macoun 1894: i i larger [here] than elsewhere’ y/ //\ i

‘ // ’/ [Watson’P] c. 1904:

Land Commission 1875: i . K .t , 'Cedar: at Tignish’.

’Cedar Posts come V" \ v”? / 'Cedar. at Montrose'.

L 6 8'.

from ots and i g I‘ / / ’Cedar - in low wet swampy places in Lots 3 and 4 ’.

Census 1841: '5\/ f , "\ i / Hill 1839

, I I /

Lot 7‘ cedar swamps. / . "VJ ’Cedar- common in the

‘ “‘mn\ \/ distrIct of Cascumpec

[Lawson] 1877-1878- Lot 11. cedar, a ’prevai/ing’ element of the original forest

Craswell & Anderson c. 1856:

‘Lot 11 [is] skirted on the back line with a fine grove of cedar poles’

Lot 1 1: 'some fine cedar swamps’.

Land Commission 1875: \\'\r\_\ Land Commission 1875: Lot 9 (at various ,r c , « Q ”‘3 M\ \ Lot 12: ’a good many cedar locations). 'cedar swamps’ [i 41%” t ‘ f “

’ ‘5) swamps. 'T here was valuable / ‘ .1 / A , E C» «Di F "‘1 cedar land some years ago’. Lot 10: there was a great ,/ (’4 l/ I, 2’ ‘ w x W” 3/3 E“ W deal of cedar Iand’. ' I , / Q: 41$ 5 .

$314M . a K j. . Gesner 1846: I. \ {a xvj L WW, \ V4 5 /r\.\\t_ Egmont Bay: 'the shores ,_ a .\ ,, W R a‘ f/ k7 abound in swamps of cedar. “ x e C 3"“ 1‘ i l , 2 ’ \ '3 \I R} \/ ’CedaI’: [along] 'the shore \ ’A} {k 41" I westward of Fifteen Point’ ”A a] H4? \ AU: “:2 14;} Miscouche: 'the quantity of cedar : ‘3' A if", increases towards the north’. “-3 Ls". 1:" r 4 i, w as

FIGURE 1-6. The geographically-locatable references to cedar in the records of the British period.