and engraving399. Bain (1890) also noted that ”the Indians make axe-handles and baskets of it”. There was also some exportation of the timber.400 Maple trees produced an additional product that was matched by no other tree: maple sugar, and the production of sugar from maple trees was commented on by many recorders“°‘. Though most did not specify the species, it is likely that they had in mind primarily the sugar maple (A. saccharum). However, both Stewart (1806) and Sutherland (1861) observed that A. rubrum also yielded sugar, though Stewart said that the sugar from the 'white maple’ [i.e. A. rubrum] was not so rich in quantity as that of the ’rock maple’.402 The use of the maple tree as a source of sugar seems to have been greatest during the early colonial period.403 For example, in 1796 John Cambridge recorded that "many families make two or three hundred pound weight of sugar404 in the early part of the spring before the snow is thawed in the woods”.405 And John Stewart, who gives 399 Bain 1890. Benjamin Chappell (1775-1818) used maple, though without specifying the species; for the following machinery: “cogs for Mr Colbeck" [i.e. for the mill] (in 1778); "screws“ and “quil tubes" (presumably parts of a spinning wheel) (1798); “spindles for the grindstone” (1798); “horses" (1799, 1801, 1803) and “staves for the mill trundles“ (1805). ‘00 Hill (1839) recorded that “some [rock or bird's-eye maple] is sent annually to England where it is used for cabinet work". Seventy-five years earlier Holland (1764) had written to Lord Hillsborough of the Board of Trade in London, saying that he would send him “a few planks of curled maple" — presumably to act as trial pieces. ‘0‘ Holland 1765 (October): (he added that the sugar was ”reckoned medicinal"); Anon. 1771; [Clark] 1779; Ritter 1780; [Cambridge] 1796?; Walsh 1803; Stewart 1806; Anon. 1808; Anon. 1818; MacGregor 1828; Hill 1839; Lawson 1851; Bagster 1861; Sutherland 1861; Bain 1890. All mention the production of maple sugar rather than maple syrup. which they presumably at that time did not have the means to preserve and store. Stewart (1806) (p. 44, not extracted) also noted that “very good vinegar" was made by fermenting the concentrated sap with yeast. ‘02 A similar comment was made by Perley (1847) in his Report on the Forest Trees of New Brunswick. He noted that for Acer rubrum “the product of a given measure [of sap] was only half as great“ as that of the sugar maple. ‘03 Apart from the British records cited here it is appropriate to note that the only record of sugar-making that I came across in the records of the French period for the island was Jean-Pierre Roma's mention of “/'herab/e qui donne du sucre” [the maple that yields sugar] in a list he made of the island's trees in 1750 (see Sobey 2002; pp. 89 and 92). ‘04 [Cambridge] 1796?. if Bain’s (1890) figure of four pounds of sugar per tree (see footnote 410) can be applied to the trees of a century before, this would mean that in 1796 50 to 75 trees were being tapped per family. “”5 On 14 March 1773 Benjamin Chappell (1775-1818) recorded at Elizabethtown that ”the Maple trees in the woods just begin to 201 an extended description of the process of extracting the sap from the trees and boiling it down to sugar‘ws, noted that in 1806 "the greatest part of the inhabitants supply themselves with all the sugar they consume", with many having ”a good deal to dispose of". However, by 1828 John MacGregor used the word ”formerly” when he said that ”a considerable quantity of sugar was procured by the inhabitants, [but] at present there is scarcely any made except by the Acadians and lndians”4°7. Seven years later, Samuel Hill, based at Cascumpec, wrote in similar vein that though sugar ”is manufactured by the older settlers, especially the Acadians and those of highland descent, [it] is rarely sold”, adding that ”the more recent English settlers value their time too highly, to employ it in the manufacture of an article, which is but a poor substitute for what the produce of their farms will well enable them to purchase”“°8. Apart from this economic cum cultural factor, another factor contributing to the decline in sugar production was likely to have been ecological: namely, the disappearance of the island’s sugar maple forests as a result of land clearance. Evidence for this is found in Bagster's comment in 1861 that sugar making occurred only in those districts where maples ”have been spared in sufficient numbers to furnish the requisite quantity for sugar making"“°9. Despite this, the production of maple sugar was still recorded as occurring some thirty years later by Bain (1890) — in fact he said that the annual sugar production of the island at that time was some 25,000 pounds”. run in juice", but he does not record that he himself was ever involved in the making of maple sugar. “’6 See Stewart (1806). (pp. 42-45 not extracted). An even more extensive description is given by Perley (1847) for New Brunswick (pp. 139-41). ‘07 MacGregor 1828. Although it is clear that the first European settlers had learned to tap maple trees from the Mi’kmaq (though for the British this may have been indirectly via the Acadians), the only written evidence that l have found for the Mi'kmaq of the island continuing to make maple sugar for their own use or for sale is that of MacGregor (1828) cited above. There is also Ritter’s (1780) comment that the Mi'kmaq were bringing sugar over to Charlottetown from Tatamagouche in Nova Scotia for sale. This may have been a single occurrence connected with the presence of an unusually large military garrison in Charlottetown that year as a result of the American rebellion; combined with the winter stranding of some 211 men from Ritter's ship, the Archer (see Bumsted 1987; pp. 74; 77, 79). 408 Hill 1839. ‘09 Bagster1861. “0 Since Bain said that each tree yielded "about four pounds of sugar" (a figure that Perley (1847) also gives for New Brunswick), we may estimate that some 6,250 maple trees were being tapped on the island at that time.