description of the ashes in the swamp that he traveled through in Lot 13 as ”large”. Habitat and community relationships — The two ash species differed in their habitat requirements: Bain (1890) said that black ash was a tree of swamps and Sutherland (1861) even called it "swamp ash”506 while Watson (post 1904) associated it with ”wet” and "swampy lands”. As already noted, it is very likely that the ash of the ’ash swamp’ encountered by Robert Gray in his trek across Lot 13 in 1793 was black ash, and | quote his unusually detailed habitat description in full: I We came into a Swamp of another kind full of large Ash trees and rendered by the underwoods consisting of Alders, dogwoodm maple etc. almost impenetrable — these growing in a horizontal direction were so intermingled that we passed generally on their tops and where they happened to be a little thin we sunk frequently to our middle in mud and water.” 507 Another type of wet ash community is evident from Selkirk’s (1803) description of a forest-type that consisted of ”red spruce intermixed with ash, alder, currants etc.” that ”showed a rich swamp capable of being made into excellent meadow”. This may be similar to a community in the eastern part of Lot 9, in the west of the province, that the surveyor Alexander Anderson called ”spruce land”, but which contained "spruce and fir and ash”, and "when cleared [made] tolerable good farms”5°8. And Selkirk’s red spruce/ash swamp, despite the difference in the spruce species, seems similar to another forest community containing ash, that is described by Bain (1890): The great shale beds of the lower Permian afford heavy clay soils. They are often swampy. Originally they were covered with a growth of black spruce, larch, ash, and willow. In cultivation they are cold and damp, ill- suited for tillage, but, under good management, supply rich pasturage. However, Gesner (1846) noted that his ”swamps of ash and cedar” in the Egmont Bay area were associated with ”light and sandy soils”, and he does not mention clay soils. 506 Perley (1847) says that it was generally known as swamp ash in New Brunswick, and the name is still widely used for it in Canada (eg, Farrar 1995). 5‘” Gray 1793. 508 Land Commission 1875: evidence of Alexander Anderson for Lot 9. Also before the Commission, H. Braddock of Lot 36 used the term “ash swamp" for a forest-type in Lot 36. 214 Whereas black ash was a swamp tree, the records indicate that white ash occurred on well-drained but fertile sites: while Bain (1890) said only that it occurred on dryer ground (compared with the black ash), and both Curtis (1775) and Johnstone (1822) describe 'ash’, presumably white, as an element of the mixed hardwood forests of the island, Stewart (1806) said that it grew ”only on good land". We have also an emphasis on rich soils in Craswell & Anderson's (1856) description of the ash wood that was intermingled among other vegetation types in Lot 11: ”here and there [there is] a narrow swale of superior ash, the soil of which is rich and fertilizing", and we have Watson's (post 1904) description of it occurring on ”rich land beside fresh water courses” at a specific site. Properties and uses — While Hill (1839) said that the timber of ash was not valuables”, Stewart (1806) said that white ash was ”a valuable tree" — though he did not specify any uses for it. MacGregor (1828) makes up for this by saying it was made into "oars, handspikes, staves, etc.” — we have a specific example in Benjamin Chappell’s use of ‘ash’ for the oars of a boat he was making in 1801”). Finally, Bain (1890) says that the wood of the white ash was used for hoop-poles and baskets as well as in cabinet work. As for the black ash, MacGregor (1828) said it was ”scarcely of any value”. In similar vein, Stewart (1806) said that it was of ”very little value”, and he noted that its chief use was for ”the making of baskets and brooms”. More specifically, Sutherland (1861) said that it was "prized by the Indians” who used the wood in "making baskets etc.". Conclusion — White and black ash were among the less common trees of the island, with the two species occurring in very different habitats. The black ash was a tree of the richer and wetter swamps, while the white ash seems to have occurred as a minority component in some of the island’s richer hardwood forests. The limited records suggest that they were both more common in the west of the island. 509 It may be that he was thinking in terms of the quantity of ash wood available on the island rather than the quality of the wood itself. 5‘” Chappell 1775-1818.